Rauschen im Kanal
Liste der Anhänge anzeigen (Anzahl: 1)
Neulich konnte man dies bei Boeing nachlesen:
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787...60521a_nr.htmlZitat:
"We have seen tremendous progress by our international partners and the Boeing team working on the detailed design of this airplane," said Mike Bair, vice president and general manager of the 787 program. "Twenty-five percent release signifies that the largest elements - like fuselage and wing skins - are defined from the tooling requirements to the specific raw material elements."
Nun, nichts wirklich interessantes. Der Chef macht seine Hauptaufgabe: Motivation hochhalten und die Fehlentscheidungen der anderen günstig verkaufen. Der Amerikaner sagt eben nicht: Es ist unmöglich, sondern es ist herausfordernd ("challenging").
Nun konnte man aber dies nachlesen:
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...607_864925.htmEin paar Auszüge:
On a Wing and a Prayer[... ] But as crucial deadlines loom, BusinessWeek has learned that Boeing's engineers are wrestling with several significant technical and production
problems that could threaten the scheduled 2008 delivery of the jetliner.
At a time when Boeing has left itself with little margin for error, the wide-ranging series of glitches could create a domino effect if not resolved quickly. The most important piece of bad news - the fuselage section, the big multi-part cylindrical barrel that encompasses the passenger seating area, has failed in company testing. That's forcing Boeing to make more sections than planned, and to reexamine quality and safety concerns. [...]
Boeing hat Probleme. War zu erwarten, wer hat die nicht. Gleichzeitig hat Boeing seinen Produktionsanlauf wie Barbarossa geplant, eben ohne Marge. Das könnte zum Verhängnis werden, jedenfalls Zeit kosten.
Technical glitches, missed deadlines, and stretched nerves are par for the course with new planes. But far more than a new plane is at stake. Boeing has undertaken a grand business experiment with the Dreamliner. In a bid to tap the best talent and hold down costs, the aerospace icon has engaged in extreme outsourcing, leaving it highly dependent on a far-flung supply chain that includes 43 "top-tier" suppliers in 12 countries. It is the first time Boeing has ever outsourced the most critical areas of the plane, the wing and the fuselage. About 80% of the Dreamliner is being fabricated by outside suppliers, vs. 51% for existing Boeing planes.
Modern business at work. Outsourcing, risk-sharing, in-the-shit-grabbing. Die neuen Wörter des "lean engineering". Witzigerweise haben manche Leute das schon im Jahre 2003 bei Boeing kritisiert.
FINANCIAL RISKS. There could also be large financial penalties for Boeing if
problems result in big delays. With demand hot, the manufacturer is mulling whether to raise production rates after 2010 from 7 to 10 airplanes a month, and possibly higher.
Hier hat BusineesWeek wieder Flurschaden angerichtet. Während "Carbon-Fiber" von den meisten Aktionären eher als Krankheit aufgefasst wird, werden bei dem Wort "Finanzielles Risiko" alle hellhörig.
In an interview with BusinessWeek, Boeing 787 Vice-President Michael Bair acknowledged the various
problems. But he insists that the Dreamliner will enter service in 2008 as planned. "Yes, the last barrel failed," Bair says. "We knew it could happen. Did we wish it would happen? No." Bair adds that "everybody is struggling a bit and struggling to various degrees." He remains optimistic, if guardedly so, about meeting the 2008 deadline. "Right now, everything looks O.K. in terms of meeting our entry into service dates for the 787," Bair told reporters in a May 22 conference call. "But as you all know, new airplanes are really hard to do."
Bair acknowledges the communications
problems -- and admits that nobody inside of Boeing thought building the 787 would be easy. After all, the company decided to bet on pushing the boundaries of the possible. "If everything was going perfect," he says, "it [would mean] you weren't trying hard enough.
Mr. Bair ist definitiy ein Business-Man. "Challenging" muss es ja irgendwie sein. Mal ne andere Frage: Warum meinen Planer immer, dass riesenhafte Probleme dazu gehören? Sind nicht Planungsfuzzies, WirsIngs und Risiko-Analysten genau dafür da, dies einigermaüen in den Griff zu kriegen? Dann können wir die ganze Bande auch wieder dahin stecken wo sie früher gut aufgehoben waren: In der Buchhaltung zum Buch halten.
P.S.: Die ganze Sache nicht zu ernst nehmen. Boeing kriegt sein Flieger schon hin, nur eben nach dem Murph'schen Gesetz:
Nichts wird jemals im Rahmen des Terminplans oder Kostenvoranschlags gebaut.